To Test or Not To Test?

Taking a Test.

The following is a post by contributing writer Sarah Small of SmallWorld at Home.

To test or not to test? It is one of the most common questions I hear in homeschooling discussions. Every state has different requirements for testing.

In our state (Tennessee), one must register in one of three ways in order to be compliant with the law. In extremely simple terms:
* you can register with your school system as an independent homeschooler. With this option, you must have your child tested at the school in grades 5, 7, and 9.
* you can register with an umbrella or Church Related School (CRS) and follow their requirements (Some require testing every year.)
* or you can “attend” a CRS and educate your child at home, which is a satellite campus. (Testing is usually not required.)

We chose the Option 3 category so that we did not have to participate in standardized testing. I know the arguments for testing among homeschoolers and I think they are valid—for families who choose to test.

Some of the arguments for testing include:

  • Achievement tests will give you an overall picture of how your kids are doing
  • Tests will help the parent to see their strengths and weaknesses.
  • Tests can help you to track their progress over the years.
  • Tests can also provide practice and confidence for other tests, like college entrance exams and placement tests.
  • Test scores can be shown “as evidence” to grandparents or other family members who question homeschooling.
  • Tests can provide accountability so that kids don’t fall through the cracks

Some of the arguments against standardized testing are:

  • The primary purpose of many tests is to rank students, teachers, and schools. Some will be labeled as successes and others as failures, and the vast majority will be labeled mediocre. The child learns that the purpose of learning is to get a high score.
  • Testing is based on the public/private school’s idea of what a child should know, and when he should know it. Standardized tests tend to narrow the curriculum to what will be tested. Obviously, this is a problem for those of us who don’t follow their state’s scope and sequence.
  • Standardized tests tend to focus attention on what students don’t know and can’t do, in situations unlike daily life. Poor test scores can decrease the confidence of both the parent/teacher and the child.
  • Testing is superficial in that it doesn’t really test the things (qualities) of highest value in a child. The child learns that thinking is not valued; getting the “right” answer is the only goal.
  • In order to properly prepare for tests, parents, like typical classroom teachers, might spend inordinate amounts of time teaching-to-the-test. In my opinion, this is a terrible waste of time before high school. Unless, of course, your kids enjoy taking tests and practicing for tests. I have a daughter who wanted a test prep workbook because she thought it would be fun.

Speaking of fun, I’ve heard lots of parents say that their kids think it is a holiday when they get to do their testing at a local umbrella school. Conversely, I know of kids in public schools who have ulcers—actually ulcers that require medication—partly because the emphasis on testing is so stressful.

And that is a great thing about having the freedom to choose to test or not to test. How many of us really believe that a child’s intelligence, achievement, and competence can be represented adequately by standardized tests? Most homeschoolers who have their children tested find the tests to be merely a source of academic feedback or a simple way to notify the state that the children are being educated according to their standards. Most homeschoolers who choose not to use test view standardized testing as unnecessary.

On a personal level, the ACT is the first standardized test for our kids. Our oldest (who is finishing his sophomore year in college) took it at age 15 for the first time and scored high enough to get decent scholarships even at that age. (He did take it again the next year in order to bump his score up into the next scholarship level.)

I’m glad we had all those years of sitting on the couch reading and making dioramas instead of learning how to fill in bubbles (yes, he actually did this regularly when he was in public school for first grade). And I haven’t regretted for a second following in that path with my younger kids.

So we’ve opted out of standardized testing before high school, but that is our choice. As in all aspects of homeschooling, there is not one right answer for every family.

So what about you? Do your kids do some kind of standardized testing? Why or why not?

Sarah Small writes about homeschooling, writing, parenting, and life in general at SmallWorld at Home. She is in her 12th year of homeschooling, currently with a 9th grader and a 5th grader. Her older son, who was homeschooled all the way through high school, is a sophomore in college. The Smalls live near the Great Smoky Mountains in East Tennessee. Photo by Renato Ganoza.

Holy Heroes

Follow The Homeschool Classroom via RSS Feed, Facebook, Twitter, or by Entering Your Email in the Box to Receive Updates by Email:

Comments

  1. We have chosen to homeschool through a public charter school. It is a system that works very well for us as there are no restrictions on what we do during the school year. However, they do require we take the state testing as a requirement of enrollment. I have explained to my kids that I don’t care how they do on this test as it tests only what someone else thinks they should have learned that year. This is not usually what we have studied that year. I would not test otherwise until high school for college entrance.

  2. Melinda J. says:

    I was homeschooled growing up and we had to either do a standardized test every year or submit a portfolio (we lived in NH at the time). I took the PSAT/ACT/SAT each year starting in freshman year, and did better each time. We have chosen for our oldest to test him every few years, using the Iowa Tests through Bob Jones University. I don’t emphasize the test and this time we didn’t even practice for it. It was only language arts and math. I just use it for my comfort level so that I know we are on track. For instance, my son is not a good speller, so we try to work on that, but we don’t fret if he gets a low score. Great article, thanks!

  3. Great article. I feel the same way about standardized tests. Completely unnecessary. It’s great if you want to have a “cram and dump” method but not good for a love of lifelong learning approach.

  4. We are required to do testing in MN. We don’t have to turn in the results, but are suggested to get extra testing if the result is a low score.
    I do like that I can kind of see how my kids are doing, but I really don’t think it’s necessary. I am with them every day and know how they are doing and what they need to work on.

  5. In Oregon, we’re required to test in grades 3, 5, 8 and 10. We only have to test math and language arts and I have found that our curriculum covers these areas well. My daughter has always done well on the tests. My son, on the other hand, not so well. He did so poorly last year that he was in tears most of the day. Fortunately, it wasn’t a required testing year, so I tore the test up and had him throw it away. Honestly, I think he just had a bad day. This year is a required year for him and I am having someone help tutor him to prepare for the test.

  6. HeatherHH says:

    In WV, we are required to do standardized testing or have a certified teacher do a portfolio evaluation every year from 1st grade through 12th. I really don’t want to prepare portfolios for all of my children and go through finding a certified teacher who will be satisfied with our laid back approach to early academics. So, we go with the testing as it’s easier. Otherwise, we wouldn’t do standardized testing.

Share a Comment

*